Nsg 6999 week 1 knowledge check

This course contains quizzes and exams. Melnyk, B. The seven steps of evidence-based practice. Gray, J. ISBN: Nursing Assignment Acers. Igniting a spirit of inquiry: An essential foundation for evidence-based practice. Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice. Order Now. Home About Us Terms and Conditions. Week 1 Knowledge Check. Week 1 Discussion.

nsg 6999 week 1 knowledge check

Week 1 Mastery Plan. Week 2 Knowledge Check. Week 2 Discussion. Week 2 Looking Ahead. Week 2 Mastery Plan. Week 3 Knowledge Check. Week 3 Discussion. Week 3 Project. Week 3 Mastery Plan. Week 4 Knowledge Check. Week 4 Discussion. Week 4 Looking Ahead.

Week 4 Mastery Plan. Week 5 Knowledge Check. Week 5 Discussion. Week 5 Looking Ahead. Week 5 Mastery Plan. Week 6 Knowledge Check. Week 6 Discussion. Week 6 Project.To complete this week, after reading chapter one in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you need to consider the topic of interest to you. List a ONE to two-word topic that you want to explore further and why you are interested in this topic.

This topic encompasses the question that you have been generating throughout your program. As an example I may choose the topic of depression, as I am interested in all of the depression I am seeing in the primary care office. As you work on your capstone project proposal, you will want to share your progress with your peers and instructor and seek or provide guidance or share insights.

Post your background question and your strategy for getting a comprehensive understanding of the clinical issue. To complete this week, after reading chapter two in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you submit a page paper that explores the background of your issue.

The parts of your paper should include:. If you are not on a clinical tract NP you will explore the issue extensively to define the problem or issue you are interested in.

Using the following table—search the 5 databases based on your PICOT Question—under findings note the number of relevant articles found—under features discuss what you liked about that database.

ON the discussion board summarize your search—attach your chart for those that would like to see your search. Limits: PubMed. National Library of Medicine. Cochrane Library. Full text of reviews are subscription only. National Guidelines. TRIP Database. Limits : Other Databases: As you work on your capstone project proposal, you will want to share your progress with your peers and instructor and seek or provide guidance or share insights.

Again, keeper studies can be identified using handy Rapid Critical Appraisal checklists consisting of a set of simple but important questions. Include Week 4 worksheet with completed Evidence Table. For the discussion board this week—outline your implementation steps Submit your Evaluation Plan to the DB —listed as ….Melynk and Fineout-Overholt note that there are seven steps to the evidence-based practice EBP process.

The first step is to cultivate a spirit of inquiry. To encourage this spirit of inquiry, you are asked in this discussion to:. Identify a problem or issue from within your specialty area that you feel needs to be improved upon.

The list below may help focus your thoughts. Discuss the relevance of the issue from your perspective not the literature at this juncture in relation to your selected advanced role option. What gave you the idea that evidence exists to support this change? Provide a rationale as to why this will be an evidence-based project to improve outcomes and not generate new evidence research. Please remember that the project will not be implemented during this course and no data will be collected.

The outcome of this course is to complete a project proposal only. Briefly describe the problem or issue that you have decided to be the topic for your project proposal in order to orient your classmates and faculty. For example: In patients recently discharged from the hospital following care for heart failure Pdo hand-off calls by the nurse to the primary care provider using the SBAR format situation, background, assessment, recommendation I compared to no calls C decrease readmission rates O over a one year period T.

Discuss which process model resonates with you and will help keep you focused during the project. Does the question reflect a clinical research question or one appropriate for an evidence-based practice project? In this discussion, you will share your search strategies that you have employed to find evidence for your study.

For this discussion:. Did using the terms used in this question lead you to useful research studies? What MESH terms have you tried? Did they help you find additional studies? Are you finding MESH terms useful to expand or delimit your search? Are you finding relevant articles? If not, how did you modify your search to increase productivity? Post any questions or concerns you may have and provide feedback and recommendations to your classmates.

Working together and sharing search strategies is very helpful. Using the appropriate Rapid Clinical Appraisal RCA Tools, appraise one or two articles and add the information to your Evaluation Table to receive feedback from faculty. At this juncture, your table is a work in progress.

You will complete it in Week 4. What worked best for you in terms of the approach you decided to use to complete the appraisal and Evaluation Table? This week the discussion focuses on creating a Synthesis Table s as a means to summarize and organize the body of evidence from the Evaluation Table.

The Synthesis tables will be included in your formal proposal in the Appendix. Share your approach to synthesizing the evidence. What were the variables of interest you identified? Learning to write in a scholarly fashion requires that you are able to succinctly summarize an article in a sentence or two and cite it appropriately using APA format. In this discussion, practice summarizing 2 articles you have identified from the Synthesis Table as pertinent to your proposal.

Include the level of evidence, study design, and evidence of rigor. Use appropriate APA citation in text and references. Incorporate feedback from peers and faculty in your Dropbox assignment for this week. In addition to research studies, patient preference and clinical expertise should also be considered. Discuss how you will incorporate these important perspectives into your project proposal.To login with Google, please enable popups. Sign up. To signup with Google, please enable popups.

Sign up with Google or Facebook. To sign up you must be 13 or older. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Already have an account? Log in. Get started today!

NSG 6999 Week 1 Discussion Essay

Nsg Quiz 2. Edit a Copy. Study these flashcards. Alexandra Q. An year-old patient who wears a hearing aid complains of poor hearing in the affected ear. In addition to possible hearing aid malfunction, this condition is often due to. In examination of the nose, the clinician observes gray, pale mucous membranes with clear, serous discharge.

This is most likely indicative of. Bacterial sinusitis Allergic rhinitis Drug abuse Skull fracture. After a quick strep screen you determine the patient has Strep throat. You know that streptococcal pharyngitis should be treated with antibiotics to prevent complications and to shorten the course of disease.

Which of the following antibiotics should be considered when a patient is allergic to Penicillin? Presbycusis is the hearing impairment that is associated with:. Epistaxis can be a symptom of:. Over-anticoagulation Hematologic malignancy Cocaine abuse All of the above. A 26 year old patient presents with cough and general malaise for 3 days. What would be the best first plan of treatment? Saline nasal spray for congestion and acetaminophen as needed for pain.

Dizziness that is described as "lightheaded" or, "like I'm going to faint," is usually caused by inadequate cerebral perfusion and is classified as? Presyncope Disequilibrium Vertigo Syncope. Cataract Macular degeneration Acute closed-angle glaucoma Chronic open-angle glocoma. Which of the following findings should trigger an urgent referral to a cardiologist or neurologist?Melynk and Fineout-Overholt note that there are seven steps to the evidence-based practice EBP process.

The first step is to cultivate a spirit of inquiry. To encourage this spirit of inquiry, you are asked in this discussion to:. Identify a problem or issue from within your specialty area that you feel needs to be improved upon. The list below may help focus your thoughts. Discuss the relevance of the issue from your perspective not the literature at this juncture in relation to your selected advanced role option.

What gave you the idea that evidence exists to support this change? Provide a rationale as to why this will be an evidence-based project to improve outcomes and not generate new evidence research. Please remember that the project will not be implemented during this course and no data will be collected. The outcome of this course is to complete a project proposal only. Briefly describe the problem or issue that you have decided to be the topic for your project proposal in order to orient your classmates and faculty.

For example: In patients recently discharged from the hospital following care for heart failure Pdo hand-off calls by the nurse to the primary care provider using the SBAR format situation, background, assessment, recommendation I compared to no calls C decrease readmission rates O over a one year period T. Discuss which process model resonates with you and will help keep you focused during the project.

Does the question reflect a clinical research question or one appropriate for an evidence-based practice project? In this discussion, you will share your search strategies that you have employed to find evidence for your study. For this discussion:. Did using the terms used in this question lead you to useful research studies? What MESH terms have you tried? Did they help you find additional studies? Are you finding MESH terms useful to expand or delimit your search?

Are you finding relevant articles? If not, how did you modify your search to increase productivity? Indicate which databases you used—those you found useful and those that were not.

Post any questions or concerns you may have and provide feedback and recommendations to your classmates. Working together and sharing search strategies is very helpful. Use the Search Tracker to keep track of search terms. Using the appropriate Rapid Clinical Appraisal RCA Tools, appraise one or two articles and add the information to your Evaluation Table to receive feedback from faculty.

At this juncture, your table is a work in progress. You will complete it in Week 4. Discuss your experience completing the rapid critical appraisal process. What worked best for you in terms of the approach you decided to use to complete the appraisal and Evaluation Table? This week the discussion focuses on creating a Synthesis Table s as a means to summarize and organize the body of evidence from the Evaluation Table.

The Synthesis tables will be included in your formal proposal in the Appendix. Share your approach to synthesizing the evidence. What were the variables of interest you identified? Learning to write in a scholarly fashion requires that you are able to succinctly summarize an article in a sentence or two and cite it appropriately using APA format. In this discussion, practice summarizing 2 articles you have identified from the Synthesis Table as pertinent to your proposal.Notice: Welcome to our university.

nsg 6999 week 1 knowledge check

To complete this week, after reading chapter one in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you need to consider the topic of interest to you. List a ONE to two-word topic that you want to explore further and why you are interested in this topic. This topic encompasses the question that you have been generating throughout your program. As an example I may choose the topic of depression, as I am interested in all of the depression I am seeing in the primary care office.

As you work on your capstone project proposal, you will want to share your progress with your peers and instructor and seek or provide guidance or share insights. Post your background question and your strategy for getting a comprehensive understanding of the clinical issue. To complete this week, after reading chapter two in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you submit a page paper that explores the background of your issue. The parts of your paper should include:.

If you are not on a clinical tract NP you will explore the issue extensively to define the problem or issue you are interested in. Using the following table—search the 5 databases based on your PICOT Question—under findings note the number of relevant articles found—under features discuss what you liked about that database. ON the discussion board summarize your search—attach your chart for those that would like to see your search.

Again, keeper studies can be identified using handy Rapid Critical Appraisal checklists consisting of a set of simple but important questions.

NSG 6999 Graduate Project in Nursing SU

Include Week 4 worksheet with completed Evidence Table. For the discussion board this week—outline your implementation steps Submit your Evaluation Plan to the DB —listed as …. Note EBP plan should resemble plan on page of the Melnyx text. Skip to content support nursingessayhub. NSG Week 1 Discussion Bottom of Form To complete this week, after reading chapter one in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you need to consider the topic of interest to you.

Week 2 Discussion Bottom of Form Post your background question and your strategy for getting a comprehensive understanding of the clinical issue. For example: In patients recently discharged from the hospital following care for heart failure Pdo hand-off calls by the nurse to the primary care provider using the SBAR format situation, background, assessment, recommendation I compared to no calls C decrease readmission rates O over a one year period T.

Provide feedback to your classmates that focuses on: The use of correct PICOT format for the question to guide the literature search. Does the question reflect a clinical issue and one appropriate for an evidence-based practice project? Support a minimum of one and challenge a minimum of one. Week 3 Project PICOT question points Submit to Project To complete this week, after reading chapter two in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you submit a page paper that explores the background of your issue.

Week 4 Discussion Using the following table—search the 5 databases based on your PICOT Question—under findings note the number of relevant articles found—under features discuss what you liked about that database. National Library of Medicine.

Full text of reviews are subscription only. Make sure the study is directly relevant to the clinical question.

What is the sample size? Size can and should vary according to the nature of the study. Since determining a valid minimum sample size in a single study can be difficult, taking into account multiple studies is beneficial. The answer to this question alone should not remove a study from the appraisal process. Are instruments of the variables in the study clearly defined and reliable? Make sure the variables were consistently applied throughout the study and that they measured what the researchers said they were going to measure.This week you will identify a topic for your capstone evidence-based project specific to your area of specialization.

This topic should be one that interests you from your course work, clinical setting or one that was revealed to you as weak in your pre-predictor exam.

To complete this week, after reading chapter one in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you need to consider the topic of interest to you. List a ONE to two-word topic that you want to explore further and why you are interested in this topic. NSG graduate project in nursing weekly discussions essays. This topic encompasses the question that you have been generating throughout your program.

As an example, I may choose the topic of depression, as I am interested in all of the depression, I am seeing in the primary care office. As you work on your capstone project proposal, you will want to share your progress with your peers and instructor and seek or provide guidance or share insights.

All responses should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area. It is important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources. Include the South University online library in your research activities utilizing not only the nursing resource database, but also those pertaining to education, business, and human resources.

By the end of the week, comment on the responses of at least two other students by supporting a minimum of one post and challenging a minimum of one post. You will want to focus on their point of view, asking pertinent questions, adding to the responses by including information from other sources, and respectfully challenging a point of view, supported by references to other sources. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language. All comments should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area.

Please only start a new thread with your original post.

NSG 6999 Week 6 Project

Hit reply to respond to a peer. This week we will focus on the one to two-word topic you identified in week one.

You will post your background question discussing how you researched it and respond to two of your peers with quality feedback—supporting one and challenging one.

You will offer and obtain feedback from classmates and faculty to helped to focus the question to aid your search. To complete this week, after reading chapter two in Melnyk and reviewing the lectures you submit a page paper that explores the background of your issue.


comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *